Displaying #cassandra-dev/2017-04-20.log:

Thu Apr 20 00:06:29 2017  clohfink:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 00:59:39 2017  yogeshnachnani_:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 01:10:56 2017  yogeshnachnani_:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 01:36:38 2017  maedhroz:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 02:38:52 2017  adamholmberg:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 03:35:27 2017  anthony__:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 03:59:52 2017  yogeshnachnani:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 04:21:44 2017  yogeshnachnani:Left the channel
Thu Apr 20 04:48:03 2017  dikang:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 05:02:24 2017  anthony__:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 05:40:19 2017  adamholmberg:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 05:43:43 2017  cosql:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 06:30:50 2017  spodkowinski:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 06:31:09 2017  lqid_:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 06:56:37 2017  krut:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 07:41:37 2017  adamholmberg:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 08:42:59 2017  adamholmberg:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 09:08:17 2017  kvaster_:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 10:14:29 2017  anthony__:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 10:35:39 2017  iamaleksey:what you did is dirty, and shouldn't have happened really - if you were in a habit of pushing with --atomic, you'd have to do all the merges first
Thu Apr 20 10:36:01 2017  iamaleksey:not a big deal though. just be more careful next time
Thu Apr 20 10:44:14 2017  adamholmberg:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 11:25:19 2017  mck_sw:iamaleksey: yes totally agree, i'm aware of the forward-port and atomic push process. that wasn't how i slipped up here (i just missed the target version in the ticket). so my question is more in the rare case when a commit has gone to trunk first, and *then* it needs to be back-ported. how should that be done?
Thu Apr 20 11:30:28 2017  kvaster:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 11:53:33 2017  rsvihla:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 12:15:08 2017  makrusak:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 12:17:33 2017  iamaleksey:mck_sw: you cherry-pick to the branch from trunk, then merge the branch into trunk with --ours?
Thu Apr 20 12:48:24 2017  mck_sw:yes ofc, thanks iamaleksey
Thu Apr 20 13:19:41 2017  anthony_:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 13:28:00 2017  adamholmberg:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 14:34:24 2017  adamholmberg:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 14:35:24 2017  adamholmberg:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 15:03:21 2017  jfarrell_:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 15:27:28 2017  kvaster:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 15:50:09 2017  maedhroz:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 15:56:25 2017  jeffj:is andres in here?
Thu Apr 20 15:57:29 2017  kohlisankalp:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 16:16:17 2017  kvaster:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 16:43:06 2017  bbromhead:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 17:00:43 2017  bbromhead:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 17:02:13 2017  kohlisankalp:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 17:06:32 2017  nickmbailey:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 17:20:20 2017  bbromhead:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 17:26:47 2017  dikang:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 17:32:12 2017  kvaster_:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 17:42:19 2017  kvaster:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 18:03:39 2017  kohlisankalp:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 18:47:48 2017  kvaster:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 18:48:39 2017  kohlisankalp:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 18:59:14 2017  bbromhead:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 19:02:56 2017  kohlisankalp:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 20:01:28 2017  bbromhead:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 20:15:45 2017  rustyrazorblade:anyone have thoughts on separate commit logs per keyspace as a step towards making multi-tenancy less of a nightmare?
Thu Apr 20 20:16:41 2017  rustyrazorblade:easing the perf impact of flushing a shitload of memtables to disk when freeing up commit log space
Thu Apr 20 21:00:12 2017  jmckenzie:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 21:10:59 2017  kohlisankalp:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 21:22:51 2017  anthony:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 21:23:17 2017  lqid_:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 21:26:22 2017  urandom:i've twice noticed that nodes get "stuck" (for lack of a better word) on startup if some kind of topology change it happening. once during a bootstrap, and the other during a removenode. anyone know if this is a known issue, and if so, what the bug number is?
Thu Apr 20 21:26:26 2017  urandom:version 2.2.6
Thu Apr 20 21:30:08 2017  jeffj:#12281
Thu Apr 20 21:30:08 2017  CassBotJr:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12281 (Resolved; Fixed; 2.2.9, 3.0.11, 3.10): "Gossip blocks on startup when there are pending range movements"
Thu Apr 20 21:30:21 2017  jeffj:(you're the reporter, is it not that issue?)
Thu Apr 20 21:30:34 2017  driftx:hah
Thu Apr 20 21:30:44 2017  urandom:sumbitch
Thu Apr 20 21:31:17 2017  urandom:jeffj: umm
Thu Apr 20 21:31:21 2017  urandom:jeffj: thanks? :)
Thu Apr 20 21:32:01 2017  urandom:i knew i'd crossed this before (i.e. the first time), but i did not remember creating an issue
Thu Apr 20 21:32:11 2017  urandom:in fact, i've been kicking myself that i did not
Thu Apr 20 21:32:17 2017  urandom:so... yay me?
Thu Apr 20 21:32:38 2017  urandom: /o\
Thu Apr 20 21:32:49 2017  jeffj:on the plus side, it's fixed already!
Thu Apr 20 21:35:04 2017  urandom:heh
Thu Apr 20 21:35:12 2017  urandom:that's perhaps even worse
Thu Apr 20 21:35:31 2017  urandom:because if i'd have known that, i might have upgraded, and not experienced the second issue
Thu Apr 20 21:35:37 2017  urandom:though, probably not
Thu Apr 20 21:35:55 2017  urandom:we're never in a hurry to upgrade
Thu Apr 20 22:00:19 2017  Guest73:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 22:34:02 2017  dikang:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 23:13:02 2017  adamholmberg:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 23:39:46 2017  clohfink:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 23:49:46 2017  clohfink:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 23:50:11 2017  kohlisankalp:Joined the channel
Thu Apr 20 23:55:25 2017  kohlisankalp:Joined the channel

Comments