Displaying #maven-dev/2017-04-01.log:

Sat Apr 1 08:43:58 2017  rfscholte:Joined the channel
Sat Apr 1 08:48:37 2017  stephenc:hboutemy rfscholte yt?
Sat Apr 1 08:49:32 2017  stephenc:is standing on the side of a GAA pitch on another early saturday morning!
Sat Apr 1 08:49:38 2017  rfscholte:I'm here
Sat Apr 1 08:50:02 2017  stephenc:So did you merge your javadocs?
Sat Apr 1 08:50:14 2017  rfscholte:yes
Sat Apr 1 08:50:17 2017  stephenc:Ok
Sat Apr 1 08:50:32 2017  stephenc:I just need a review of my mng-6195 branch
Sat Apr 1 08:50:53 2017  stephenc:It fixes 6191(2) 6195 and 6198
Sat Apr 1 08:51:34 2017  stephenc:If i get some feedback i'll merge and we'll have all open issues for 3.5.0 resolved
Sat Apr 1 08:52:20 2017  stephenc:I'd like to cut an RC either this w/e or monday
Sat Apr 1 08:52:37 2017  rfscholte:I don't have that OS available, I guess Michael should review it
Sat Apr 1 08:53:08 2017  stephenc:Michael said freebsd's bourne shell has $() support
Sat Apr 1 08:53:16 2017  stephenc:So its just solaris 10
Sat Apr 1 08:53:52 2017  stephenc:I'd be happy to drop solaris 10 *except* we already fixed the scripts for solaris 10 in 3.5.0
Sat Apr 1 08:54:01 2017  stephenc:Just then broke them again
Sat Apr 1 08:54:36 2017  stephenc:So having one of the fixed issues be "make mvn work on solaris 10" would be wrong
Sat Apr 1 08:55:25 2017  stephenc:I think we need to define our platform support policy though
Sat Apr 1 08:55:49 2017  stephenc:For 3.6.0 i'd like to define two tiers
Sat Apr 1 08:55:50 2017  rfscholte:I agree
Sat Apr 1 08:56:47 2017  stephenc:Tier 1: ubuntu/fedora/debian/centos/windows/macOS current release
Sat Apr 1 08:57:53 2017  stephenc:Tier 2: previous release of above plus current release of freebsd and solaris/openindiana
Sat Apr 1 08:58:42 2017  stephenc:Tier 1 is "we will run the integration tests before a ga release and a failure blocks the release"
Sat Apr 1 08:59:34 2017  stephenc:Tier 2 is "reports of integration test failures will hold up a release providing patches are forthcoming in 1 week"
Sat Apr 1 08:59:47 2017  rfscholte:sounds reasonable
Sat Apr 1 09:00:35 2017  stephenc:We can use docker images to get OT coverage on the different linuxen
Sat Apr 1 09:00:53 2017  stephenc:s/OT/IT/;
Sat Apr 1 09:01:50 2017  stephenc:So we *should* be able to get infra to enable that testing
Sat Apr 1 09:02:06 2017  stephenc:Of tier 1 anyway, from the ci server
Sat Apr 1 09:02:30 2017  rfscholte:olamy: ^^
Sat Apr 1 09:02:54 2017  stephenc:I'd probably use a conditional stage so that we only do the extra testing on master branch
Sat Apr 1 09:03:16 2017  stephenc:That way PRs just run on raw ubuntu and windows
Sat Apr 1 09:03:36 2017  stephenc:We'll need to decide the jvm policy too
Sat Apr 1 09:03:56 2017  stephenc:3.6.0 is likely to be arround java 9
Sat Apr 1 09:04:22 2017  rfscholte:we'll see ;)
Sat Apr 1 09:04:23 2017  stephenc:Our official policy for jvm support would say java 8 & 9 only
Sat Apr 1 09:05:02 2017  stephenc:As java 7 is eol but we only target it because we do one and kne back
Sat Apr 1 09:05:24 2017  stephenc:s/kne/one/;
Sat Apr 1 09:05:56 2017  stephenc:I think we will need a 3.5.1
Sat Apr 1 09:06:18 2017  stephenc:Given my hope was that 3.5.0 would have been released early feb
Sat Apr 1 09:06:24 2017  stephenc:And we are now april
Sat Apr 1 09:06:56 2017  rfscholte:we'll, I'm probably the only one saying that supporting only 2 JRE's is not enough. A lot still use the JAVA_HOME as runtime for Maven AND the JDK to compile their code with.
Sat Apr 1 09:07:36 2017  stephenc:I think a 3.5.1 is going to need at least 4 weeks to get users actually trying 3.5.0, then the fix and release cycle is realistically another 4-8 weeks
Sat Apr 1 09:07:50 2017  rfscholte:+1 for 3.5.1
Sat Apr 1 09:08:10 2017  stephenc:So that would be 3.5.1 released end of may or mid june
Sat Apr 1 09:08:51 2017  stephenc:If we let that soak for 4 weeks and follow a 4-8 week release cycle
Sat Apr 1 09:09:10 2017  stephenc:3.6.0 or 3.5.2 will be after java 9 is released
Sat Apr 1 09:09:25 2017  rfscholte:that's already more often than the last 1.5 years :)
Sat Apr 1 09:09:47 2017  stephenc:I am going to keep trying to drive a release cadence
Sat Apr 1 09:10:18 2017  stephenc:If somebody else wants to play bad cop as a release manager, i'm happy to hand over reins
Sat Apr 1 09:10:36 2017  stephenc:But i want to follow through on my promise to get 3.5.1 out firstt
Sat Apr 1 09:11:17 2017  stephenc:And this project IMHO requires the releas manager to tightly reign in scope for each release
Sat Apr 1 09:11:25 2017  stephenc:Otherwise we ship nothing
Sat Apr 1 09:12:14 2017  stephenc:Anyway, i think we need to plan that 3.6.0 will be post java 9 release
Sat Apr 1 09:12:15 2017  rfscholte:so true, I'm happy you've picked this one up.
Sat Apr 1 09:12:42 2017  stephenc:If we have a 3.5.2 that would be post java 9 too
Sat Apr 1 09:12:46 2017  rfscholte:I still need to work on m-compiler-p for some Java9 issues.
Sat Apr 1 09:12:51 2017  stephenc:Yes
Sat Apr 1 09:13:37 2017  stephenc:My point is we need to start focusing on making 3.6.0 (or we could call it 4.0.0) the version of maven you use with java 9
Sat Apr 1 09:13:39 2017  rfscholte:also need to better think on multirelease jar support, all available patterns are sub-optimal
Sat Apr 1 09:13:56 2017  stephenc:Yes
Sat Apr 1 09:14:23 2017  stephenc:I think this means several things
Sat Apr 1 09:14:37 2017  stephenc:1. Toolchains, we got to sort that shit out
Sat Apr 1 09:15:08 2017  stephenc:2. Tiered platform support (we dont have resources to test everything)
Sat Apr 1 09:15:33 2017  stephenc:3. Proactively look for testers from the community
Sat Apr 1 09:16:07 2017  stephenc:By this i mean that we ask for people willing to help test lower tiered platforms
Sat Apr 1 09:16:24 2017  stephenc:We give them a role and recognition on the website
Sat Apr 1 09:16:48 2017  stephenc:We give them a voting right on core releases
Sat Apr 1 09:17:28 2017  stephenc:There are people who cannot contribute *code* or *documentation* because of employment agreements
Sat Apr 1 09:18:05 2017  stephenc:But they can contribute PASS/FAIL on OS ___ with Java ___
Sat Apr 1 09:18:33 2017  rfscholte:+1
Sat Apr 1 09:18:54 2017  stephenc:And if we can make the ITs easier to run it should only take 30min of their CPU time (runnit iver lunch break)
Sat Apr 1 09:19:09 2017  stephenc:s/iver/over/;
Sat Apr 1 09:20:12 2017  stephenc:We need to find new ways to grow our community
Sat Apr 1 09:20:38 2017  stephenc:Or else we give up and use ugh gradle... barf no thanks
Sat Apr 1 09:20:44 2017  Michael-O:Joined the channel
Sat Apr 1 09:21:09 2017  stephenc:Michael-O: does my mng-6195 branch pass its on freebsd?
Sat Apr 1 09:21:25 2017  Michael-O:Yes, it does.
Sat Apr 1 09:21:33 2017  Michael-O:I did reply on the ML.
Sat Apr 1 09:21:50 2017  stephenc:Yeah hard to follow sometimes ;-)
Sat Apr 1 09:22:07 2017  stephenc:Ok i'll see about merging and cutting an rc
Sat Apr 1 09:22:42 2017  stephenc:Is your ITs behind nexus just a surefire IT issue?
Sat Apr 1 09:22:44 2017  mbenson__:Joined the channel
Sat Apr 1 09:24:11 2017  stephenc:Michael-O: ^^^
Sat Apr 1 09:24:34 2017  Michael-O:No, it is a Maven IT
Sat Apr 1 09:24:37 2017  Michael-O:Core IT Suite
Sat Apr 1 09:24:45 2017  stephenc:Ok
Sat Apr 1 09:24:57 2017  stephenc:Do you think it is a blocker?
Sat Apr 1 09:25:06 2017  Michael-O:I will file an issue today about this.
Sat Apr 1 09:25:16 2017  Michael-O:The ITs aren't the issue, but the setup.
Sat Apr 1 09:25:35 2017  stephenc:IMHO it does not sound like a regression wrt 3.3.9 - which means not a blocker imho
Sat Apr 1 09:25:41 2017  Michael-O:Somehow Reolver does not get it right when Nexus is configured, Central overridden twice.
Sat Apr 1 09:25:47 2017  Michael-O:No, it is not.
Sat Apr 1 09:26:05 2017  stephenc:I think we need the ITs to use mrm
Sat Apr 1 09:26:08 2017  Michael-O:But it is ugly as hell, basically everyone behind a repo manager cannot seriously run our ITs.
Sat Apr 1 09:26:32 2017  stephenc:We need to switch to mrm then wdyt refs cholte
Sat Apr 1 09:26:43 2017  stephenc:rfscholte: ^^^
Sat Apr 1 09:26:55 2017  stephenc:curses phone keyboard
Sat Apr 1 09:28:07 2017  Michael-O:What is MRM?
Sat Apr 1 09:28:19 2017  stephenc:Michael-O: but this is more an issue with the IT suite
Sat Apr 1 09:28:30 2017  stephenc:Mock Repository Manager
Sat Apr 1 09:28:59 2017  rfscholte:absolutely, MRM is the way to go
Sat Apr 1 09:29:24 2017  Michael-O:Moreover, I am not really fond taht the ITs require hard connection to Central. This should be necessary if you have an repo manager in place.
Sat Apr 1 09:29:40 2017  stephenc:It was a plugin I wrote to let me run IT tests at a former employers as I had to run behind a proxy
Sat Apr 1 09:30:35 2017  stephenc:Yep MRM basically reuses the invoking maven's local repo and it's settings as a proxy
Sat Apr 1 09:30:58 2017  stephenc:So you typically don't have to configure anything
Sat Apr 1 09:31:00 2017  rfscholte:with the release of last week almost every interaction with a repository manager is covered, I think/hope
Sat Apr 1 09:31:45 2017  Michael-O:This one http://www.mojohaus.org/mrm/, right?
Sat Apr 1 09:31:50 2017  stephenc:Yes
Sat Apr 1 09:32:42 2017  stephenc:Anyone have thoughts on how to decide the scope of 3.5.1?
Sat Apr 1 09:34:06 2017  Michael-O:Just running the tests again: ... in file:target/null was cached in the local repo, resolution....
Sat Apr 1 09:34:10 2017  Michael-O:over and over again
Sat Apr 1 09:34:22 2017  rfscholte:how about pushing 3.5.0 and wait for a couple of weeks and than decide what to do for 3.5.1?
Sat Apr 1 09:35:12 2017  stephenc:That's my plan
Sat Apr 1 09:35:24 2017  stephenc:But we have issues left over
Sat Apr 1 09:35:34 2017  rfscholte:Michael-O: yes, I know that issue...
Sat Apr 1 09:35:57 2017  stephenc:I'd like to be able to make decisions on what goes in
Sat Apr 1 09:36:14 2017  olamy:stephenc what’s up?
Sat Apr 1 09:36:30 2017  stephenc:If we cut 3.5.0 and do nothing for 4 weeks waiting for bugs... not looking great
Sat Apr 1 09:36:54 2017  rfscholte:some issues are already marked for 3.5.1, we need to go over that list again too if they are still accurate
Sat Apr 1 09:36:59 2017  Michael-O:rfscholte, do you know why this happens wand I what can I do about it?
Sat Apr 1 09:37:08 2017  stephenc:olamy: do the ubuntu nodes on builds.a.o have docker?
Sat Apr 1 09:37:30 2017  olamy:uhm no idea
Sat Apr 1 09:37:42 2017  olamy:just create a freestyle job an try :-)
Sat Apr 1 09:37:46 2017  stephenc:rfscholte: that is what we need to derermine
Sat Apr 1 09:37:53 2017  rfscholte:Michael-O: IIUC this is some kind of trick to ensure no unwanted dependencies leak into the ITs
Sat Apr 1 09:38:16 2017  olamy:I think some folks asked in the past so should be there
Sat Apr 1 09:38:22 2017  olamy:but not sure
Sat Apr 1 09:38:37 2017  stephenc:olamy: well i'll try a pipeline withDocker so
Sat Apr 1 09:38:55 2017  stephenc:Or maybe an agent { docker } ;-)
Sat Apr 1 09:38:58 2017  olamy:yup who cares about build failure :-)
Sat Apr 1 09:39:10 2017  stephenc:I can do it in a branch
Sat Apr 1 09:39:18 2017  stephenc:Delete the brach after ;-)
Sat Apr 1 09:39:18 2017  Michael-O:rfscholte, and it is supposed to cause a failured?
Sat Apr 1 09:39:24 2017  Michael-O:What can I do about that?
Sat Apr 1 09:41:02 2017  rfscholte:Michael-O: IIRC, don't use a repository manager or proxy, always run 'mvn install'
Sat Apr 1 09:42:20 2017  rfscholte:Michael-O: I had quite some issues with the ITs, very frustrating so quite often I just had to compare the runs to see if only the same tests are failing (yeah, it's bad...)
Sat Apr 1 09:42:58 2017  Michael-O:at the moment, I cannot seriously test our stuff at work in the background
Sat Apr 1 09:44:06 2017  rfscholte:that's why we need to switch to MRM ;)
Sat Apr 1 09:44:29 2017  Michael-O:How wil it solve the issue?
Sat Apr 1 09:45:18 2017  hboutemy:on doing a RC: why not 3.5.0?
Sat Apr 1 09:45:26 2017  hboutemy:we're going to extra length, IMHO
Sat Apr 1 09:45:49 2017  hboutemy:and this week, I was at a HackerGarten: people were ready to test 3.5.0-beta-1, but could not find it
Sat Apr 1 09:46:17 2017  hboutemy:it shoul dbe visible from http://maven.apache.org/download.cgi
Sat Apr 1 09:46:30 2017  hboutemy:we're doing hard things, but not simple things to get people help us
Sat Apr 1 09:46:52 2017  rfscholte:with MRM you introduce a mirror where you can control all downloads
Sat Apr 1 09:47:26 2017  Michael-O:But how does it makes a difference to a Nexus instance?
Sat Apr 1 09:50:15 2017  rfscholte:MRM is lightweight and you can control every request easily.
Sat Apr 1 09:58:54 2017  hboutemy:AFAIK, you can integrate a MRM instance in your ITs: AFAIK you can't integrate a Nexus instance in your ITs
Sat Apr 1 10:10:17 2017  hboutemy:rfscholte: what are there squash commits?
Sat Apr 1 10:10:27 2017  hboutemy:both on Maven and Maven Archetype
Sat Apr 1 10:11:24 2017  rfscholte:I don't want to have a huge load of separate commits for 1 issue
Sat Apr 1 10:12:00 2017  hboutemy:you should not push the default message IMHO
Sat Apr 1 10:12:19 2017  hboutemy:I'm completely supportive of the squash; but not the commit message
Sat Apr 1 10:12:30 2017  hboutemy:the first line does not even contain Jira issue ID
Sat Apr 1 10:12:44 2017  rfscholte:ah, I see your point
Sat Apr 1 10:15:23 2017  hboutemy:(I prefer to tell it on IRC than on tghe ML, even if it could be useful on the ML to share with others: but I've played the bad guy too much these days...)
Sat Apr 1 10:16:24 2017  rfscholte:this wasn't a bad guy message
Sat Apr 1 10:19:02 2017  hboutemy:I feel like a cop recently, and I don't like it :(
Sat Apr 1 10:20:12 2017  rfscholte:I recognize that feeling. It's all for the good, I know
Sat Apr 1 10:30:23 2017  tibor_:Michael-O: I did run tests with Version 2.19.2-SNAPSHOT in maven.git with build success, and now in maven-integration-testing.git
Sat Apr 1 11:35:31 2017  tibor_:There is one error.
Sat Apr 1 11:35:47 2017  tibor_:MavenITmng5805PkgTypeMojoConfiguration
Sat Apr 1 11:36:05 2017  tibor_:Text not found in log: CLASS_NAME=org.apache.maven.its.mng5805.TestClass1
Sat Apr 1 11:56:07 2017  tibor_:The test fails on this
Sat Apr 1 11:56:09 2017  tibor_:[WARNING] Expected TEXT, not XML: START_TAG seen ...<phases><validate><mojos>... @1:64
Sat Apr 1 11:56:43 2017  tibor_:Is it related to alpha-1 which I am runing with now.
Sat Apr 1 13:46:54 2017  Michael-O:tibor_, I have the XML error once too
Sat Apr 1 13:49:03 2017  Michael-O:stephenc, I checked 96543b7c6ea52ad7ba3bcd559c38b159f8aa4c0d. You have removed several quotes. Are you sure about that?
Sat Apr 1 13:49:10 2017  Michael-O:Did you test dirs with spaces?
Sat Apr 1 13:50:11 2017  tibor_:no, I do not use spaces in path
Sat Apr 1 13:51:25 2017  tibor_:@stephenc Where is this commit?
Sat Apr 1 13:54:10 2017  Michael-O:On maven
Sat Apr 1 13:54:15 2017  tibor_:MavenITmng5753CustomMojoExecutionConfiguratorTest.java:64
Sat Apr 1 13:54:33 2017  Michael-O:tibor_, I am talking about maven.git 96543b7c6ea52ad7ba3bcd559c38b159f8aa4c0d right now
Sat Apr 1 13:54:33 2017  tibor_:failed later. Maybe because I removed "clean".
Sat Apr 1 13:54:44 2017  Michael-O:MNG-6195.
Sat Apr 1 13:54:57 2017  Michael-O:The failures you have are due to inreliable ITs
Sat Apr 1 13:55:06 2017  Michael-O:this is a big issue in the setup itself
Sat Apr 1 13:55:12 2017  Michael-O:I am struggling too here
Sat Apr 1 14:04:34 2017  Michael-O:btw, the Mojo IT issue also fails on Windows 7
Sat Apr 1 14:08:21 2017  tibor_:If you mean MavenITmng5805PkgTypeMojoConfiguration, then yes.
Sat Apr 1 14:10:47 2017  tibor_:and MavenITmng5753CustomMojoExecutionConfiguratorTest>AbstractMavenIntegrationTestCase.runTest:222 failed once out of two runs.
Sat Apr 1 14:17:31 2017  Michael-O:Exactly, instead of TRANSFORMED I have it multiple times: TRANSFORMEDTRANSFORMEDTRANSFORMED
Sat Apr 1 14:18:29 2017  Michael-O:stephenc, I think we have a regression. Both tibor_ and me can reproduce an IT failure.
Sat Apr 1 14:19:21 2017  tibor_:expected:<TRANSFORMED[]> but was:<TRANSFORMED[TRANSFORMED]>
Sat Apr 1 14:19:33 2017  Michael-O:correct
Sat Apr 1 14:19:39 2017  Michael-O:Just had this on Windows 7
Sat Apr 1 14:19:49 2017  tibor_:win7
Sat Apr 1 14:20:03 2017  tibor_:you on freebsd?
Sat Apr 1 14:21:28 2017  Michael-O:Both
Sat Apr 1 15:05:49 2017  Michael-O:I was able to fix two more ITs. Will commit soon
Sat Apr 1 15:05:59 2017  Michael-O:Another issue is up next
Sat Apr 1 15:10:14 2017  rfscholte:really wants to mark install-file/deploy-file goals with requiresDirectInvocation=true
Sat Apr 1 15:38:31 2017  stephenc:Joined the channel
Sat Apr 1 16:00:10 2017  Michael-O:stephenc, are you here?
Sat Apr 1 16:57:56 2017  theRealGent:Joined the channel
Sat Apr 1 17:40:32 2017  tibor_:Joined the channel
Sat Apr 1 19:09:49 2017  tibor_:Joined the channel
Sat Apr 1 19:11:21 2017  tibor_:Michael-O: We are near to release.
Sat Apr 1 19:14:43 2017  Michael-O:You shoud also update Maven parent and retest
Sat Apr 1 19:15:44 2017  tibor_:I am testing branch surefire-1317, the last one.
Sat Apr 1 19:16:44 2017  tibor_:Updating Maven parent is what I did today. I will do it again. No worries.
Sat Apr 1 19:17:50 2017  tibor_:Renaming the Version 2.19.2 to 2.20.0 in Jira goes without troubles in Jira, right?
Sat Apr 1 19:18:44 2017  tibor_:In code string 2.19.2 should be renamed too. Do we need Jira ticket? I guess only a plain commit.
Sat Apr 1 20:26:26 2017  Michael-O:JIRA is straight forward. Bumping the version in SCM is not worth a ticket.
Sat Apr 1 20:26:38 2017  Michael-O:Make sure that @sice and so on are clean after your change
Sat Apr 1 20:27:49 2017  Michael-O:I have found two more issues with the ITs in a non-direct Internet connection environment
Sat Apr 1 20:41:23 2017  tibor_:Michael-O: you mean 2 ITs in Maven?
Sat Apr 1 20:41:48 2017  tibor_:Somebody is investigating it?
Sat Apr 1 20:44:06 2017  Michael-O:I did, one is fixed. The other one is on its way.
Sat Apr 1 20:44:22 2017  Michael-O:MNG-6200 and MNG-6202
Sat Apr 1 21:12:27 2017  Michael-O:both fixed now
Sat Apr 1 22:22:04 2017  Michael-O:tibor_, can you do me a favor?
Sat Apr 1 22:23:13 2017  tibor_:tell me
Sat Apr 1 22:24:01 2017  Michael-O:Can you build Maven from MNG-6169 and run all ITs from run-its.sh?
Sat Apr 1 22:24:16 2017  Michael-O:I have several Guice provisioning errors on Windows and FreeBSD
Sat Apr 1 22:26:25 2017  tibor_:ok, i will
Sat Apr 1 22:28:29 2017  Michael-O:Maven from master works as expected
Sat Apr 1 22:32:10 2017  Michael-O:Windows 10:
Sat Apr 1 22:32:12 2017  Michael-O:Failed tests:
Sat Apr 1 22:32:12 2017  Michael-O: MavenITmng5640LifecycleParticipantAfterSessionEnd>AbstractMavenIntegrationTestCase.runTest:222->testBuildErrorRt:199 Expected file was not found: D:\Entwicklung\Projekte\maven-integration-testing\core-it-suite\target\test-classes\mng-5640-lifecycleParticipant-afterSession\builderror-runtimeex\target\afterProjectsRead.txt
Sat Apr 1 22:32:12 2017  Michael-O: MavenITmng5640LifecycleParticipantAfterSessionEnd>AbstractMavenIntegrationTestCase.runTest:222->testBuildFailureMissingDependency:109 Expected file was not found: D:\Entwicklung\Projekte\maven-integration-testing\core-it-suite\target\test-classes\mng-5640-lifecycleParticipant-afterSession\buildfailure-depmissing\target\afterProjectsRead.txt
Sat Apr 1 22:32:13 2017  Michael-O:Tests in error:
Sat Apr 1 22:32:15 2017  Michael-O: MavenITmng5530MojoExecutionScopeTest>AbstractMavenIntegrationTestCase.runTest:222->test_copyfiles_multithreaded:78 ╗ Verification
Sat Apr 1 22:32:20 2017  Michael-O: MavenITmng5578SessionScopeTest>AbstractMavenIntegrationTestCase.runTest:222->testBasic_buildExtension:99 ╗ Verification
Sat Apr 1 22:32:23 2017  Michael-O:Tests run: 788, Failures: 2, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0
Sat Apr 1 22:32:53 2017  Michael-O:FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE:
Sat Apr 1 22:32:54 2017  Michael-O:Failed tests:
Sat Apr 1 22:32:54 2017  Michael-O: MavenITmng5640LifecycleParticipantAfterSessionEnd>AbstractMavenIntegrationTestCase.runTest:222->testBuildErrorRt:199 Expected file was not found: /usr/home/mosipov/Projekte/maven-integration-testing/core-it-suite/target/test-classes/mng-5640-lifecycleParticipant-afterSession/builderror-runtimeex/target/afterProjectsRead.txt
Sat Apr 1 22:32:54 2017  Michael-O: MavenITmng5640LifecycleParticipantAfterSessionEnd>AbstractMavenIntegrationTestCase.runTest:222->testBuildFailureMissingDependency:109 Expected file was not found: /usr/home/mosipov/Projekte/maven-integration-testing/core-it-suite/target/test-classes/mng-5640-lifecycleParticipant-afterSession/buildfailure-depmissing/target/afterProjectsRead.txt
Sat Apr 1 22:32:56 2017  Michael-O:Tests in error:
Sat Apr 1 22:32:58 2017  Michael-O: MavenITmng5578SessionScopeTest>AbstractMavenIntegrationTestCase.runTest:222->testBasic_buildExtension:99 » Verification
Sat Apr 1 22:32:59 2017  tibor_:maven.git is ok, now running its.
Sat Apr 1 22:33:01 2017  Michael-O:Tests run: 788, Failures: 2, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0
Sat Apr 1 22:33:13 2017  Michael-O:Branch MNG-6169
Sat Apr 1 22:33:23 2017  Michael-O:?
Sat Apr 1 22:33:39 2017  tibor_:I was in master.
Sat Apr 1 22:33:47 2017  Michael-O:Please build for this branch
Sat Apr 1 22:33:49 2017  Michael-O:Master is fine
Sat Apr 1 22:33:55 2017  tibor_:ok, I will switch to branch.
Sat Apr 1 22:47:54 2017  Michael-O:I am excited to see your results
Sat Apr 1 22:49:55 2017  tibor_:The its are running.
Sat Apr 1 22:50:19 2017  Michael-O:Did you start with -Pembedded too?
Sat Apr 1 22:52:08 2017  tibor_:no
Sat Apr 1 22:52:30 2017  tibor_:Is -Pembedded necessary?
Sat Apr 1 22:54:37 2017  Michael-O:No, but it runs way faster
Sat Apr 1 22:54:42 2017  Michael-O:no forking
Sat Apr 1 22:54:54 2017  Michael-O:it is enough to provoke the failures
Sat Apr 1 22:55:01 2017  Michael-O:5 min takes the entire build
Sat Apr 1 22:59:15 2017  tibor_:It is far in progress.
Sat Apr 1 22:59:32 2017  Michael-O:good
Sat Apr 1 22:59:40 2017  Michael-O:See already failures?
Sat Apr 1 23:00:34 2017  tibor_:yes 5753
Sat Apr 1 23:01:44 2017  Michael-O:Give me the summary when it is done
Sat Apr 1 23:02:21 2017  tibor_:ok
Sat Apr 1 23:22:51 2017  Michael-O:Done?
Sat Apr 1 23:51:40 2017  Michael-O:It have narrowed the issue down now

Comments