Displaying #traffic-server/2015-11-09.log:

Mon Nov 9 02:48:30 2015  gancho:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 05:06:46 2015  gancho:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 07:05:30 2015  gancho:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 07:19:03 2015  gancho:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 07:31:47 2015  gancho:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 09:25:36 2015  Lethalman:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 09:45:25 2015  Randeep:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 09:49:40 2015  Randeep:Hi all, is there any hardware specification required for the ATS server. Any case studies are available? For this many connections/s need this kind of processor? Do we need to concentrate on RAM and RAW disk only?
Mon Nov 9 09:50:07 2015  Humbedooh:pretty much :)
Mon Nov 9 09:50:20 2015  Humbedooh:usually, your bandwidth is the bottleneck with ATS
Mon Nov 9 09:54:10 2015  Randeep:How much it can withstand? from your experience
Mon Nov 9 09:55:02 2015  Humbedooh:in terms of what? requests per second?
Mon Nov 9 09:55:12 2015  Humbedooh:I think zwoop once bragged that it could do 300,000/second :p
Mon Nov 9 09:56:38 2015  Randeep:any idea what kind of hardware he used to benchmark this
Mon Nov 9 09:57:45 2015  Randeep:we have a iptv project and we have to install ats in every local cable operator's premises. number is very high and the budget is the main concern. So need to size the servers accordingly.
Mon Nov 9 09:58:29 2015  Humbedooh:I'd have to defer to zwoop et al on that
Mon Nov 9 09:58:50 2015  Humbedooh:but bare metal is cheap these days, so if you want a bang for your buck, go for that instead of a VM :)
Mon Nov 9 10:00:33 2015  Humbedooh:they did a 200,000/second benchmark back in 2011
Mon Nov 9 10:00:54 2015  Humbedooh:and what was top notch in machinery back then is probably easily obtainable today
Mon Nov 9 10:01:02 2015  Randeep:is it necessary that we need to have quad core or octacore processor? and SSD for RAW? What kind of drives you are using in production? can we use SAS/SATA for RAW? We will be streaming live channels on MPEG Dash
Mon Nov 9 10:02:44 2015  Humbedooh:if you can contain the data within a limited space, SSDs are always good :)
Mon Nov 9 10:03:13 2015  felicity:Randeep: given the amount of money you're spending, i really think you need to be doing your own benchmarks
Mon Nov 9 10:03:16 2015  Randeep:it will be like 10mb chunks and will require only for a few seconds. 4-6s
Mon Nov 9 10:03:17 2015  Humbedooh:as for processors, quad should be sufficient I think - but it depends on the processor, what the benchmark score is
Mon Nov 9 10:03:35 2015  Humbedooh:how much throughput do you expect?
Mon Nov 9 10:03:43 2015  Humbedooh:1gbps? higher?
Mon Nov 9 10:04:11 2015  Randeep:felicity : Yes we will be checking it ourself. But getting some idea before we start will be great.
Mon Nov 9 10:04:22 2015  Humbedooh:and yeah, as felicity says - it's highly dependent on the specific scenario
Mon Nov 9 10:04:38 2015  Randeep:1gbps
Mon Nov 9 10:05:10 2015  Humbedooh:and how much data will there be in total on the machine?
Mon Nov 9 10:05:19 2015  Humbedooh:terabytes? gigabytes?
Mon Nov 9 10:05:24 2015  Humbedooh:petabytes? :P
Mon Nov 9 10:05:31 2015  Randeep::P
Mon Nov 9 10:05:59 2015  Humbedooh:a rule of thumb is that you should have at least 10% of the total disk size in RAM for it...IIRC
Mon Nov 9 10:06:19 2015  Humbedooh:so if you're serving up 500GB of content, 50GB RAM would be preferable
Mon Nov 9 10:06:48 2015  Randeep:in gbs only. 15-20G
Mon Nov 9 10:06:56 2015  Randeep:275 channels
Mon Nov 9 10:07:04 2015  Humbedooh:oh, then you don't need much in terms of hardware :)
Mon Nov 9 10:07:11 2015  Randeep:we wont keep the chunks more than 6s
Mon Nov 9 10:07:41 2015  Humbedooh:if it's such a small data storage, then go for some SSDs and try to keep it all in RAM :)
Mon Nov 9 10:08:09 2015  Randeep:8gb DDR3 RAM and 320GB SAS disk will be ok to start with?
Mon Nov 9 10:08:12 2015  Humbedooh:but you'll definitely need to try it out, see how a server performs
Mon Nov 9 10:08:17 2015  Humbedooh:it would be okay, yes
Mon Nov 9 10:08:34 2015  Humbedooh:but if you rewrite your content a lot, you should look into maybe getting SSDs
Mon Nov 9 10:08:45 2015  Randeep:Yes We will check with SAS and SSD also.
Mon Nov 9 10:09:59 2015  Humbedooh:what's your machine budget like?
Mon Nov 9 10:10:10 2015  Humbedooh:just wondering what you can get with your budget :)
Mon Nov 9 10:10:35 2015  Randeep:But will it be in RAM if we increase the RAM_cache.size. Or some amount of raw disk is always required?
Mon Nov 9 10:10:55 2015  Randeep:here it goes. Dont laugh. 30k INR
Mon Nov 9 10:11:08 2015  Humbedooh:per month?
Mon Nov 9 10:11:10 2015  Humbedooh:or year?
Mon Nov 9 10:11:40 2015  Randeep:per ats server. We will be installing physical servers in local cable operator's premises
Mon Nov 9 10:11:47 2015  Humbedooh:ah, okay
Mon Nov 9 10:12:01 2015  Humbedooh:otherwise, you could just rent a machine with SSDs and 64GB RAM for that price :)
Mon Nov 9 10:12:43 2015  Randeep:yes. the issue is there will be 600-800 LCO locations
Mon Nov 9 10:12:50 2015  Humbedooh:like https://www.online.net/en/dedicated-server/dedibox-md or https://www.hetzner.de/us/hosting/produkte_rootserver/ex40ssd etc
Mon Nov 9 10:13:12 2015  Humbedooh:dunno if there's something similar in India
Mon Nov 9 10:13:32 2015  luc:Humbedooh: online is best for france, but from other country sometimes is a pitty
Mon Nov 9 10:13:49 2015  Randeep:ya there is not much like that here
Mon Nov 9 10:13:59 2015  Humbedooh:luc: yeah - we use them in the ASF but we only use 2-3mbps on those boxes, so it's a non-issue
Mon Nov 9 10:14:35 2015  Randeep:And we will be deploying this in our mpls vpn
Mon Nov 9 10:14:36 2015  luc:Humbedooh: it's my ssh box ;)
Mon Nov 9 10:14:38 2015  Humbedooh:I've benchmarked them though and I get 500mbps locally and around 150mbps across the big pond, so it's good enough for us
Mon Nov 9 10:15:02 2015  Humbedooh:we are datacenter whores, so to speak - I think we're in 9 DCs or so ;)
Mon Nov 9 10:15:34 2015  Humbedooh:Randeep: 8gb should be fine for your use case, but if you could get 32GB that would mean awesome performance :)
Mon Nov 9 10:15:45 2015  Randeep:well. We are a start up company too. So lot of budget contrains.
Mon Nov 9 10:15:52 2015  Humbedooh:yeah, I know that feeling :)
Mon Nov 9 10:16:11 2015  Humbedooh:gotta start small and then see what you can afford to expand
Mon Nov 9 10:16:23 2015  Randeep:Yes. So I'm making sure that processor and motherboard supports upto 32gb atleast
Mon Nov 9 10:22:00 2015  Randeep:In the same line, we will be providing iptv and internet services also. We are keeping the parent server in headend and in the LCOs will be child. How can I give more priority to the IPTV cache and less or selective priority for internet.
Mon Nov 9 11:21:57 2015  sommarnatt:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 11:44:28 2015  JSeymour:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 12:51:30 2015  sommarna_:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 13:43:02 2015  Randeep:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 14:20:58 2015  shinrich1:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 14:47:35 2015  davet_:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 14:51:28 2015  esproul:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 15:10:12 2015  danielxu:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 15:39:24 2015  Randeep:Hi how can I do forward proxy and reverse proxy in a same ats server. I have to enable forward proxy to enable caching of internet traffic and reverse proxy for our iptv content. For reverse proxy I have to enable remap configuration but for forward proxy I have to disable! please advice
Mon Nov 9 15:42:55 2015  felicity:you don't have to enable remap for a reverse proxy, it'll work fine with the appropriate remap rules
Mon Nov 9 15:43:08 2015  felicity:(i mean, you don't have to enable remap_required)
Mon Nov 9 15:45:21 2015  zwoop:yep
Mon Nov 9 15:45:35 2015  Randeep:You mean this I can set to 0 "proxy.config.url_remap.remap_required INT 1"
Mon Nov 9 15:45:57 2015  Randeep:but this I have to keep 1 ? "proxy.config.reverse_proxy.enabled INT 1"
Mon Nov 9 15:49:16 2015  Randeep:felicty: zwoop: am I right?
Mon Nov 9 15:50:06 2015  Randeep:I have this in my remap.config
Mon Nov 9 15:50:07 2015  Randeep:map http://vod.domain.com/ http://172.16.0.6/ @plugin=/opt/ats/libexec/trafficserver/regex_remap.so @pparam=/tmp/vod_regex.config @pparam=no-query-string
Mon Nov 9 15:53:19 2015  Randeep:so If the request match any rules in remap.config, it will apply. else it will act as the forward proxy right?
Mon Nov 9 16:06:17 2015  zwoop:Randeep yes
Mon Nov 9 16:07:46 2015  Randeep:Zwoop: thanks
Mon Nov 9 16:13:06 2015  gancho:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 16:16:49 2015  gancho:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 16:33:41 2015  Becoming_:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 16:50:28 2015  blattj:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 17:06:19 2015  danielxu:If anyone is interested, here's a list of all the debug tags used in `Debug()` calls across the repo
Mon Nov 9 17:06:22 2015  danielxu:http://pastebin.com/78PRL0jq
Mon Nov 9 17:14:47 2015  sudheerv:danielxu: nice, I wonder if it'd be good to include this in some docs (may be, faq?)
Mon Nov 9 17:15:07 2015  sudheerv:i understand this list is an evolving list and is not-guaranteed to remain stable even
Mon Nov 9 17:15:21 2015  sudheerv:but, you could probably add a note to that effect in there as well
Mon Nov 9 17:15:27 2015  zwoop:we really should clean this up, it'd be a good 7.0 project to organize these
Mon Nov 9 17:15:35 2015  zwoop:with a better name space
Mon Nov 9 17:15:37 2015  zwoop:like
Mon Nov 9 17:15:39 2015  zwoop:http.headers
Mon Nov 9 17:15:48 2015  zwoop:http.range
Mon Nov 9 17:15:49 2015  zwoop:etc.
Mon Nov 9 17:15:57 2015  zwoop:cache.<foo>
Mon Nov 9 17:16:12 2015  zwoop:there's a Jira on cleaning this up too :)
Mon Nov 9 17:18:32 2015  zwoop:jpeach what's with these commits without Jiras?
Mon Nov 9 17:18:42 2015  gancho:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 17:18:46 2015  jpeach:sorry I got lazy
Mon Nov 9 17:18:47 2015  zwoop:The last one for traffic_cop introduces two new Coverity issues (I'll make a new Jira for that)
Mon Nov 9 17:19:07 2015  zwoop:I'm gonna have to smack you on the nose at the summit! :-)
Mon Nov 9 17:19:08 2015  jpeach:I didn't get a coverity email
Mon Nov 9 17:19:27 2015  zwoop:Hmmm, they don't go to issues@ any more? :/
Mon Nov 9 17:20:21 2015  jpeach:looks like random messages wend to my junk
Mon Nov 9 17:20:37 2015  zwoop: :)
Mon Nov 9 17:20:39 2015  zwoop:TS-4003
Mon Nov 9 17:20:48 2015  danielxu:Here's the script I used to generate the list
Mon Nov 9 17:20:50 2015  danielxu:http://pastebin.com/mKH1fu7Q
Mon Nov 9 17:21:35 2015  zwoop:jpeach danielxu sorry I'm being a dick about Coverity, but I'd like us to keep our momentum on making our Coverity bug density low (and keep improving it)
Mon Nov 9 17:21:42 2015  jpeach:zwoop: those are not introduced by my change
Mon Nov 9 17:22:13 2015  zwoop:jpeach ah. Yeah, it's possible that whomever touches a file last just triggers coverity. It's not particularly "stable"
Mon Nov 9 17:22:21 2015  zwoop:it's happened before a few times too
Mon Nov 9 17:23:28 2015  zwoop:you can return the Jira to the "pool" if you don't wish to fix it
Mon Nov 9 17:23:42 2015  danielxu:I will fix the 2 new coverity issues
Mon Nov 9 17:23:49 2015  zwoop:danielxu sweet! :)
Mon Nov 9 17:23:49 2015  danielxu:I wonder why they only appeared now
Mon Nov 9 17:24:03 2015  jpeach:assigned
Mon Nov 9 17:24:12 2015  zwoop:danielxu Coverity is not particularly predictable, something in those other changes might have made it possible for it to detect this. But who knows.
Mon Nov 9 17:25:07 2015  sudheerv:zwoop: +1 on that suggestion :)
Mon Nov 9 17:25:10 2015  zwoop:it could just have been that the file changed that made it re-run some checks too... Regardless
Mon Nov 9 17:25:17 2015  sudheerv:right now, the debug tags are anyone's whims and fancies :)
Mon Nov 9 17:25:45 2015  sudheerv:(and requires one to actually look into the code each time..would'd be good to standardize this)
Mon Nov 9 17:25:50 2015  zwoop:yeah
Mon Nov 9 17:26:56 2015  zwoop:TS-152
Mon Nov 9 17:27:38 2015  zwoop:John suggests e.g. cache_<foo> since . has special meaning in regexes.
Mon Nov 9 17:28:34 2015  zwoop:but some sort of hierarchy would be nice, with consistency. Probably e.g. <module>_<component>[_<feature>] or some such
Mon Nov 9 17:30:13 2015  jpeach:. is still better and clearer
Mon Nov 9 17:35:06 2015  zwoop:jpeach fwiw, the Coverity emails still goes to private@, I just checked
Mon Nov 9 17:35:51 2015  gancho:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 17:39:08 2015  gancho:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 17:44:08 2015  adam_:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 17:48:11 2015  Humbedooh:pffft @ zwoop - making me send emails and what not
Mon Nov 9 17:51:25 2015  zwoop:Humbedooh I know
Mon Nov 9 17:52:44 2015  Humbedooh:and now I'm coughing - I blame that on you as well
Mon Nov 9 17:58:21 2015  zwoop:Humbedooh obviously
Mon Nov 9 17:59:00 2015  blattj:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 18:01:04 2015  Humbedooh:hmm, discounting jira, github and jenkins, traffic server MLs have been surprisingly stable this year
Mon Nov 9 18:02:54 2015  adam__:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 18:03:13 2015  es:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 18:03:15 2015  jpeach:surprisingly?
Mon Nov 9 18:04:01 2015  Humbedooh:well you'd think things go up and down :)
Mon Nov 9 18:04:52 2015  whyameye:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 18:05:38 2015  Humbedooh:https://pony-poc.apache.org/trends.html?*@trafficserver.apache.org:lte=1y:-JIRA%20-GitHub%20-jenkins - 1% change in emails compared to previous year :)
Mon Nov 9 18:08:33 2015  adam_:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 18:15:35 2015  adam_:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 18:17:27 2015  zero_shane:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 18:25:51 2015  zwoop:Heh, nice
Mon Nov 9 18:26:37 2015  zwoop:why do some of us show up twice? Different from: addresses ?
Mon Nov 9 18:27:26 2015  zwoop:178 participants, that's cool
Mon Nov 9 18:28:45 2015  adam_:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 18:33:06 2015  adam_:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 18:37:54 2015  adam_:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 18:42:59 2015  adam_:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 18:51:08 2015  adam_:Can Traffic Server transparently proxy HTTPS? By "transparent" I mean that not only is the client not configured to use a proxy, but they also do not need to add any trusted certificates. I'm not trying to cache or decrypt the requests, I just need to make sure they go where they need to. I have a flimsy but working server (not Traffic Server) that uses the TLS certificate's Server Name Indication to figure out where to proxy to. I also have T
Mon Nov 9 18:51:08 2015  adam_:raffic Server set up on OS X that transparently proxies HTTP, but hangs for HTTPS.
Mon Nov 9 18:58:14 2015  sudheerv:zwoop: 178 to the summit :) that's crazy :)
Mon Nov 9 18:58:22 2015  sudheerv:of course, crazy nice!
Mon Nov 9 18:59:09 2015  bcall:178 participants on the mailing list
Mon Nov 9 18:59:29 2015  sudheerv:oh
Mon Nov 9 18:59:39 2015  sudheerv:haha - i thought it was to the summit
Mon Nov 9 19:00:12 2015  sudheerv:it'd be mind-blowing to have 178 people attend the summit though :)
Mon Nov 9 19:00:22 2015  bcall:118 on the summit :)
Mon Nov 9 19:00:30 2015  sudheerv:ha!
Mon Nov 9 19:00:35 2015  bcall:wait my paste was wrong :(
Mon Nov 9 19:00:38 2015  sudheerv:that's very high too
Mon Nov 9 19:00:40 2015  sudheerv::)
Mon Nov 9 19:00:41 2015  sudheerv:oh ok
Mon Nov 9 19:02:58 2015  adam__:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 19:03:21 2015  zwoop:bcall 103 people signed up for the summit
Mon Nov 9 19:03:31 2015  blattj:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 19:03:31 2015  zwoop:amc can you double check with Josh to make sure we're still good for that many ?
Mon Nov 9 19:03:45 2015  sbeards:should probably start working on his presentation
Mon Nov 9 19:04:29 2015  sudheerv:didn't know there would be so many people when I sent a request to present :)
Mon Nov 9 19:04:34 2015  sudheerv:now, i'm nervous :-/
Mon Nov 9 19:04:50 2015  sbeards:imagine that many people in their underwear
Mon Nov 9 19:04:55 2015  bcall:103 is a lot
Mon Nov 9 19:04:56 2015  sudheerv:haha
Mon Nov 9 19:04:59 2015  sudheerv:it is
Mon Nov 9 19:05:03 2015  bcall:bunch of yahoos
Mon Nov 9 19:05:06 2015  sudheerv:a looooooot
Mon Nov 9 19:05:20 2015  sbeards:there are a lot of ats users at yahoo
Mon Nov 9 19:05:29 2015  sbeards:"edge" is a minority
Mon Nov 9 19:05:53 2015  zwoop:bcall are you editing the page? I'm going to reduce the size of Ed Hall's slot, because it makes the time schedule look weird
Mon Nov 9 19:06:16 2015  bcall:I will stop editing it
Mon Nov 9 19:06:27 2015  bcall:done
Mon Nov 9 19:07:10 2015  bcall:zwoop, PSUdaemon: tired?
Mon Nov 9 19:07:19 2015  zwoop:I think amc missed the point of coloring the different slots alternating blue/yellow, such that it's easy to see the time slots :)
Mon Nov 9 19:07:31 2015  zwoop:bcall not too bad, but I stayed up until 11pm last night
Mon Nov 9 19:08:02 2015  bcall:zwoop: I went to bed at 8pm, but woke up at 12am for a couple hours
Mon Nov 9 19:08:10 2015  zwoop:lol
Mon Nov 9 19:08:14 2015  zwoop:that sucks
Mon Nov 9 19:08:19 2015  zwoop:yeah, I slept until 6:30am
Mon Nov 9 19:08:31 2015  zwoop:but I also slept like 6 hours on the plane :)
Mon Nov 9 19:08:39 2015  bcall:yeah, I thought it was 5am because I was looking at japan time
Mon Nov 9 19:08:44 2015  zwoop:lol
Mon Nov 9 19:09:33 2015  zwoop:amc bcall what do you think about switching Ed Hall and the new plugins sessions?
Mon Nov 9 19:09:49 2015  zwoop:give Ed the full hour on Monday
Mon Nov 9 19:10:20 2015  zwoop:alternatively, I think we can add a slot at the end of Tuesday, I don't think we have to close so early :)
Mon Nov 9 19:10:20 2015  bcall:depends on how much time gancho and sbeards needs
Mon Nov 9 19:11:29 2015  bcall:I would add it to the end of the day on tuesday, but then you need a 30min to fill in there
Mon Nov 9 19:11:42 2015  _klk_:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 19:11:52 2015  zwoop:move Ed Hall to end of Tuesday ?
Mon Nov 9 19:12:07 2015  bcall:yeah, but what would fill the 30min slot then
Mon Nov 9 19:12:14 2015  sudheerv:zwoop: you stayed up until 11 pm last night :)?
Mon Nov 9 19:12:23 2015  sudheerv:that's normal for me ;)
Mon Nov 9 19:12:42 2015  zwoop:bcall yeah, we can fill that I think
Mon Nov 9 19:12:58 2015  zwoop:sudheerv we just came back from Japan, which was like a 16h time difference ...
Mon Nov 9 19:13:05 2015  amc:I spoke with Ed and he seemed to think 30 minutes was better for him.
Mon Nov 9 19:13:10 2015  bcall:k
Mon Nov 9 19:13:14 2015  zwoop:amc hmmm, ok
Mon Nov 9 19:13:20 2015  amc:I'll ping him again if you want.
Mon Nov 9 19:13:24 2015  zwoop:amc sure
Mon Nov 9 19:13:31 2015  zwoop:I think we can move him to 4pm without a problem
Mon Nov 9 19:13:40 2015  sudheerv:ha…that's a long flight (still better than flying to India I guess)
Mon Nov 9 19:13:45 2015  zwoop:yeah
Mon Nov 9 19:14:21 2015  zwoop:I'm also thinking we might want to move one of Sudheer's talk, or merge them into one ?
Mon Nov 9 19:15:44 2015  sudheerv:zwoop: that's fine with me
Mon Nov 9 19:16:06 2015  sudheerv:i was actually going to ask that :)
Mon Nov 9 19:16:16 2015  sudheerv:(merge the two into one)
Mon Nov 9 19:18:22 2015  sbeards:could easily fill 1 hour on plugins
Mon Nov 9 19:18:55 2015  zwoop:sbeards how many plugins are you discussing ?
Mon Nov 9 19:19:04 2015  gancho:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 19:19:29 2015  sbeards:4 or 5
Mon Nov 9 19:20:05 2015  sbeards:Not sure about Gancho
Mon Nov 9 19:20:09 2015  sbeards:need to sync up with him
Mon Nov 9 19:20:41 2015  zwoop:he's got one
Mon Nov 9 19:21:27 2015  zwoop:sudheerv jpeach I know I've asked this before, but this keeps coming up internally. Do we have a way to enable H2 only for a set of domains and/or certificate contexts ?
Mon Nov 9 19:21:53 2015  zwoop:it's pretty draconian to have only an all or nothing for this, particularly during rollout.
Mon Nov 9 19:23:11 2015  sudheerv:zwoop: we now have a way to do it per SNI, but, requires a plugin
Mon Nov 9 19:23:33 2015  zwoop:is that in the source tree ?
Mon Nov 9 19:24:12 2015  sudheerv:the core change is in the source, the plugin probably not
Mon Nov 9 19:24:25 2015  sudheerv:i can write one example if needed
Mon Nov 9 19:25:36 2015  sudheerv:TS-3152
Mon Nov 9 19:25:37 2015  sudheerv:oops
Mon Nov 9 19:25:39 2015  sudheerv:TS-3153
Mon Nov 9 19:25:47 2015  zwoop:ok
Mon Nov 9 19:26:09 2015  zwoop:I'm replying to shinrich1 email re: TLS, I think we should discuss how we manage all these TLS related configurations, features and options
Mon Nov 9 19:26:17 2015  sudheerv:zwoop: sorry, I planned to write an example plugin, but, didn't find time..i can write one this week
Mon Nov 9 19:26:22 2015  sudheerv:+1
Mon Nov 9 19:26:27 2015  zwoop:yeah
Mon Nov 9 19:26:37 2015  zwoop:I sort of feel that we ought to have a better story with how we configure this
Mon Nov 9 19:26:50 2015  sudheerv:yeah, fwiw - i didn't like the idea of having a plugin to do this config
Mon Nov 9 19:26:56 2015  shinrich1:zwoop: Agreed. Good thing to discuss
Mon Nov 9 19:26:57 2015  sudheerv:and wanted to have something in ssl multicert
Mon Nov 9 19:27:06 2015  sudheerv:but, was downvoted in favor of a plugin based config :)
Mon Nov 9 19:27:07 2015  zwoop:nod
Mon Nov 9 19:27:26 2015  zwoop:one thing that's slightly concerning for the SUmmit is that it's very top heavy on presentations, and little room for discussion topics.
Mon Nov 9 19:27:30 2015  zwoop:we might ahve accepted too many talks
Mon Nov 9 19:28:02 2015  shinrich1:Some of the talks will end up being very discussion-oriented.
Mon Nov 9 19:30:28 2015  zwoop:k
Mon Nov 9 19:30:36 2015  zwoop:shinrich1 I replied to your email on dev@
Mon Nov 9 19:32:04 2015  shinrich1:Thanks
Mon Nov 9 19:32:12 2015  zwoop:amc I added a session at the end of day 2, Cache Control APIs
Mon Nov 9 19:32:15 2015  zwoop:we need to figure that out
Mon Nov 9 19:32:25 2015  amc:You'll be leading it, I presume :-)
Mon Nov 9 19:34:12 2015  blattj1:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 19:34:27 2015  PSUdaemon:bcall: no time to be tired!
Mon Nov 9 19:34:28 2015  zwoop:You have nothing else to do, right ?
Mon Nov 9 19:34:40 2015  bcall:PSUdaemon: yeah :(
Mon Nov 9 19:34:56 2015  amc:Dang, you caught me again. Allright.
Mon Nov 9 19:35:32 2015  PSUdaemon:went to bed at 11pm woke up at 5:45
Mon Nov 9 19:35:56 2015  amc:So you've had a productive day. Excellent.
Mon Nov 9 19:46:31 2015  bcall:zwoop: do you have an asan build with regression testing in jenkins?
Mon Nov 9 19:46:51 2015  bcall:zwoop: I would guess no
Mon Nov 9 19:48:21 2015  blattj:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 19:55:47 2015  zwoop:bcall no
Mon Nov 9 19:56:03 2015  zwoop:bcall I don't know that it passes yet, I made a bunch of fixes for it, but there were a few that I couldn't figure out
Mon Nov 9 19:56:13 2015  bcall:I am seeing TS-3654
Mon Nov 9 19:56:43 2015  bcall:what one are you seeing?
Mon Nov 9 20:14:37 2015  reveller:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 20:28:06 2015  _klk_:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 20:47:51 2015  bcall:shinrich1: do you know if you tested TS-3654 with asan and running the regression test?
Mon Nov 9 20:49:47 2015  adam____:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 20:51:49 2015  bahumbug:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 20:51:49 2015  bahumbug:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 20:52:38 2015  shinrich1:Yes, I saw it in parallel to zwoop.
Mon Nov 9 20:52:47 2015  shinrich1:This was on the open source master at the time.
Mon Nov 9 21:01:33 2015  gancho:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 21:07:51 2015  bcall:shinrich1: there are two different disk_vols arrays, I don't think the fix in TS-3654 would have helped
Mon Nov 9 21:08:11 2015  bcall:I opened a new bug TS-4004
Mon Nov 9 21:20:53 2015  gancho:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 21:28:51 2015  zwoop:cool
Mon Nov 9 21:29:14 2015  zwoop:amc but yes, I'll work with that slot with you. I think it'd be good to get some consensus
Mon Nov 9 21:34:58 2015  gancho:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 21:46:38 2015  gancho:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 21:50:08 2015  gancho:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 22:01:10 2015  gancho:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 22:09:58 2015  jrushford:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 22:11:58 2015  jrushford:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 22:21:36 2015  _klk_:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 23:13:51 2015  shinrich1:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 23:16:35 2015  shinrich2:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 23:33:41 2015  thumbs:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 23:40:12 2015  niq:Joined the channel
Mon Nov 9 23:50:56 2015  adam____:Joined the channel

Comments